Na análise das matérias orçamentárias, os membros das casas Legislativas desempenham uma variedade de atividades abrangentes, que englobam estudos, avaliações, debates, consultas e a busca ativa por informações.
As emendas ao projeto de Lei Orçamentária Anual (LOA) ou aos projetos que o modifiquem podem ser aprovadas caso
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE (F):
( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.
The statements are, respectively
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
According to the text, the word that “this extraordinary gift” (5th paragraph) refers to is our
Em um Tribunal de Contas Estadual havia sete conselheiros, sendo quatro nomeados pela Assembleia Legislativa e três pelo Governador do Estado. Ocorre que o decano da Corte de Contas se aposentou, conselheiro este que havia sido indicado pela Assembleia Legislativa, liberando sua vaga. Ocorre que, por razões históricas, as três indicações realizadas pelos Governadores à época foram de livre escolha, tendo sido preenchidas por membros da sociedade local, até então estranhos ao quadro de pessoal do Tribunal de Contas.
A par da situação, o Governador questionou a Procuradoria-Geral quanto a possibilidade de ele nomear um dentre os membros do Ministério Público junto à Corte de Contas de modo a garantir a sua representatividade no Plenário, em observância ao prescrito na Carta Magna.
Qual das alternativas apresenta parecer condizente à Súmula 653 e ao tema de repercussão geral 652, ambos do Supremo Tribunal Federal:
Determinado processo administrativo foi encaminhado para apreciação do Ministério Público de Contas do Estado de Goiás, ocasião em que, com base nas regras de distribuição, foi encaminhado ao Procurador de Contas XX. No momento da distribuição, dois assessores do Procurador-Geral de Contas debateram sobre a possibilidade, ou não, de serem estabelecidas orientações a serem observadas pelo Procurador que atuará no caso, quanto à análise do seu mérito.
Ao final do debate, os assessores concluíram corretamente que
