Internal audit’s role in ESG reporting
Conversations and focus on sustainability, typically grouped into environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, are quickly evolving — from activist investor groups and inquisitive regulators pushing for change to governing bodies and C-suite executives struggling to understand and embrace the concept. At the forefront of this new risk area is pressure for organizations to make public commitments to sustainability and provide routine updates to ESG-related strategies, goals, and metrics that are accurate and relevant. However, ESG reporting is still immature, and there is not a lot of definitive guidance for organizations in this space. For example, there is no single standard for what should be reported.
What is clear is that strong governance over ESG — as with effective governance overall — requires alignment among the principal players as outlined in The Internal Institute of Auditors (IIA) Three Lines Model. As with any risk area, internal audit should be well-positioned to support the governing body and management with objective assurance, insights, and advice on ESG matters.
Embarking on the ESG journey
Efforts to mitigate the accelerating effects of climate change and address perceived historical social inequities are two powerful issues driving change globally. These movements have enhanced awareness of how all organizations impact, influence, and interact with society and the environment.
They also have spurred organizations to better recognize and manage ESG risks (i.e., risks associated with how organizations operate in respect to their impact on the world around them). This broad risk category includes areas that are dynamic and often driven by factors that can be difficult to measure objectively.
Still, there is growing urgency for organizations to understand and manage ESG risks, particularly as investors and regulators focus on organizations producing high-quality reporting on sustainability efforts. What’s more, that pressure is being reflected increasingly in executive performance as more organizations tie incentive compensation metrics to ESG goals.
As ESG reporting becomes increasingly common, it should be treated with the same care as financial reporting. Organizations need to recognize that ESG reporting must be built on a strategically crafted system of internal controls and accurately reflect how an organization’s ESG efforts relate to each other, the organization’s finances, and value creation.
Internal audit can and should play a significant role in an organization’s ESG journey. It can add value in an advisory capacity by helping to identify and establish a functional ESG control environment. It also can offer critical assurance support by providing an independent and objective review of the effectiveness of ESG risk assessments, responses, and controls.
Source: Adapted from https://na.theiia.org/about-ia/PublicDocuments/WhitePaper-Internal-Audits-Role-in-ESG-Reporting.pdf
( ) One of the hurdles of ESG issues is that they have been restricted to a single group of experts.
( ) There has been such a great demand for publicizing government efforts towards ESG that reports have become accurate and systematized.
( ) Part of the internal auditor’s job is to be knowledgeable enough in the area of ESG so as to be able to provide solid guidance to those in charge of the administration.
The statements are, respectively:
Um crédito é ofertado em 36 prestações mensais antecipadas de R$ 3.000,00 à taxa de juros compostos de 3% ao mês. Indiferentemente, como alternativa, o mesmo crédito pode ser quitado com:
i. entrada de R$ 10.000,00;
ii. 3 parcelas anuais antecipadas de R$ 5.000,00, com pagamento da primeira concomitantemente com a entrada, à taxa de juros compostos de 3% ao mês;
iii. o restante financiado em 36 prestações mensais, à taxa de juros compostos de 3% ao mês.
Se o tomador do empréstimo optar pela opção alternativa, o valor aproximado do montante a ser financiado mensalmente, em reais, é de:
Utilize a aproximação: (1,03)-12=0,7
O Tribunal de Contas da União (TCU), ao apreciar narrativa de irregularidades supostamente ocorridas no âmbito de entidade sujeita à sua jurisdição e às quais teve ciência a partir de denúncia devidamente conhecida por preencher todos os requisitos de admissibilidade, constata a necessidade de instauração de instrumento de fiscalização específico vocacionado à apuração dos fatos denunciados. Em tal situação, considerando o tratamento dispensado pelo Regimento Interno do TCU à matéria, o instrumento de fiscalização a ser utilizado é o(a):
A Lei Orgânica do Tribunal de Contas da União (Lei Federal nº 8.443, de 16 de julho de 1992) prevê a competência da Corte para decidir sobre consulta que lhe seja formulada por autoridade competente, a respeito de dúvida suscitada na aplicação de dispositivos legais e regulamentares concernentes à matéria de sua competência, tratando-se de importante instrumento processual vocacionado ao exercício da função orientadora e pedagógica por parte do TCU. A respeito da apreciação e formulação de respostas a consultas que sejam dirigidas ao TCU, deve-se considerar que:
A gestão burocrática baseada no marco teórico de Weber caracteriza-se pelo exercício hierárquico da autoridade, com ênfase na aplicação impessoal de regras racionais e formais. Dentre os diversos problemas advindos desse modelo estão a rigidez do comportamento institucional, a adesão literal às regras e o cumprimento acrítico de ordens ignorando a razoabilidade e os possíveis efeitos adversos. Em resposta a esse modelo surge o paradigma pós-burocrático da New Public Management (NPM).
A NPM busca soluções para os problemas da burocrmodeloacia weberiana, dentre essas soluções estão a quebra da opacidade burocrática por meio da:
