Ir para o conteúdo principal
Milhares de questões atuais de concursos.

Questões de Concurso – Aprova Concursos

Milhares de questões com o conteúdo atualizado para você praticar e chegar ao dia da prova preparado!


Exibir questões com:
Não exibir questões:
Minhas questões:
Filtros aplicados:

Dica: Caso encontre poucas questões de uma prova específica, filtre pela banca organizadora do concurso que você deseja prestar.

Exibindo questões de 194 encontradas. Imprimir página Salvar em Meus Filtros
Folha de respostas:

  • 1
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 2
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 3
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 4
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 5
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 6
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 7
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 8
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 9
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 10
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 11
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 12
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 13
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 14
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 15
    • Certo
    • Errado

The use of the phrase “the backlash” in the title of Text II means the:

In the fragment of the text “Thankfully, this time around, the

outlook for renewable energy isn't so bleak" (lines 11-12), the

word bleak can be replaced, with no change in meaning, by

On the ideas of the text and the vocabulary used in it, judge the next items.

Replacing “earlier” (l.17) by older changes the meaning of the last sentence of the text.

If you are holding a fishing pole, the word “bank” means a:

The phrase “stunted professional growth” implies that professional growth may be

READ TEXT I AND ANSWER QUESTIONS 11 TO 15

TEXT I

Will computers ever truly understand what we're saying?

Date: January 11, 2016

Source University of California - Berkeley

Summary:

If you think computers are quickly approaching true human

communication, think again. Computers like Siri often get

confused because they judge meaning by looking at a word's

statistical regularity. This is unlike humans, for whom context is

more important than the word or signal, according to a

researcher who invented a communication game allowing only

nonverbal cues, and used it to pinpoint regions of the brain where

mutual understanding takes place.

From Apple's Siri to Honda's robot Asimo, machines seem to be

getting better and better at communicating with humans. But

some neuroscientists caution that today's computers will never

truly understand what we're saying because they do not take into

account the context of a conversation the way people do.

Specifically, say University of California, Berkeley, postdoctoral

fellow Arjen Stolk and his Dutch colleagues, machines don't

develop a shared understanding of the people, place and

situation - often including a long social history - that is key to

human communication. Without such common ground, a

computer cannot help but be confused.

"People tend to think of communication as an exchange of

linguistic signs or gestures, forgetting that much of

communication is about the social context, about who you are

communicating with," Stolk said.

The word "bank," for example, would be interpreted one way if

you're holding a credit card but a different way if you're holding a

fishing pole. Without context, making a "V" with two fingers

could mean victory, the number two, or "these are the two

fingers I broke."

"All these subtleties are quite crucial to understanding one

another," Stolk said, perhaps more so than the words and signals

that computers and many neuroscientists focus on as the key to

communication. "In fact, we can understand one another without

language, without words and signs that already have a shared

meaning."

(Adapted from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/1

60111135231.htm)

If you are holding a fishing pole, the word “bank” means a:

“en route" (R.24) can be replaced by on the way without any

change in the meaning of the sentence.

On the ideas of the text and the vocabulary used in it, judge the next items.

In line 9, “unless” can be correctly replaced by except if.

In text 8A5AAA, the word “unless” (R.20) conveys the idea of

The word ‘robust’ (l.15) can be correctly replaced by effective without this bringing any change of meaning to the sentence.


Based on the text, judge the following items.

The expressions “scrutinised” (l.7), “undertaking” (l.15) and “comply with” (l.21) can be respectively replaced by probed, setting about and conform to without this harming the text’s coherence and meaning


Based on the text above, judge the following items.

The meaning of the expression “are used to” (L.1) is equivalent to are accustomed to.

© Aprova Concursos - Al. Dr. Carlos de Carvalho, 1482 - Curitiba, PR - 0800 727 6282