Ir para o conteúdo principal

Questões de Concurso – Aprova Concursos

Milhares de questões com o conteúdo atualizado para você praticar e chegar ao dia da prova preparado!


Exibir questões com:
Não exibir questões:
Minhas questões:
Filtros aplicados:

Dica: Caso encontre poucas questões de uma prova específica, filtre pela banca organizadora do concurso que você deseja prestar.

Exibindo questões de 1629 encontradas. Imprimir página Salvar em Meus Filtros
Folha de respostas:

  • 1
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 2
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 3
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 4
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 5
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 6
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 7
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 8
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 9
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 10
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 11
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 12
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 13
    • Certo
    • Errado
  • 14
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e
  • 15
    • a
    • b
    • c
    • d
    • e

The three main arguments against big data raised by Text II in the second paragraph are:

The title of Text I reveals that the author of this text is:

READ TEXT I AND ANSWER QUESTIONS 11 TO 15

TEXT I

Will computers ever truly understand what we're saying?

Date: January 11, 2016

Source University of California - Berkeley

Summary:

If you think computers are quickly approaching true human

communication, think again. Computers like Siri often get

confused because they judge meaning by looking at a word's

statistical regularity. This is unlike humans, for whom context is

more important than the word or signal, according to a

researcher who invented a communication game allowing only

nonverbal cues, and used it to pinpoint regions of the brain where

mutual understanding takes place.

From Apple's Siri to Honda's robot Asimo, machines seem to be

getting better and better at communicating with humans. But

some neuroscientists caution that today's computers will never

truly understand what we're saying because they do not take into

account the context of a conversation the way people do.

Specifically, say University of California, Berkeley, postdoctoral

fellow Arjen Stolk and his Dutch colleagues, machines don't

develop a shared understanding of the people, place and

situation - often including a long social history - that is key to

human communication. Without such common ground, a

computer cannot help but be confused.

"People tend to think of communication as an exchange of

linguistic signs or gestures, forgetting that much of

communication is about the social context, about who you are

communicating with," Stolk said.

The word "bank," for example, would be interpreted one way if

you're holding a credit card but a different way if you're holding a

fishing pole. Without context, making a "V" with two fingers

could mean victory, the number two, or "these are the two

fingers I broke."

"All these subtleties are quite crucial to understanding one

another," Stolk said, perhaps more so than the words and signals

that computers and many neuroscientists focus on as the key to

communication. "In fact, we can understand one another without

language, without words and signs that already have a shared

meaning."

(Adapted from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/1

60111135231.htm)

Based on the summary provided for Text I, mark the statements below as TRUE (T ) or FALSE (F ). ( ) Contextual clues are still not accounted for by computers. ( ) Computers are unreliable because they focus on language patterns. ( ) A game has been invented based on the words people use. The statements are, respectively:

The title of Text I reveals that the author of this text is:

Based on the summary provided for Text I, mark the statements below as TRUE (T ) or FALSE (F ). ( ) Contextual clues are still not accounted for by computers.
( ) Computers are unreliable because they focus on language patterns.
( ) A game has been invented based on the words people use.
The statements are, respectively:

The three main arguments against big data raised by Text II in the second paragraph are:

According to Duboc (2016, p. 62), critical literacy differs from critical reading as the former holds that:

According to Jordão (2013), critical pedagogy differs from structuralist pedagogies because, among other reasons, it

Critical literacy emphasizes the need to use language as a vehicle for social change. One of the strategies a teacher may use for this purpose is

In a classroom situation in which the student asks the teacher if British or American pronunciation should be preferred, the most adequate answer the teacher should give, from a postcolonial orientation, is:

Duboc (2016, p. 65) mentions three generations of evaluation practices. Match the frameworks and the focus of their methods:
1- Behaviorism
2- Constructivism
3- Sociocultural theories
( ) Learner-centered methods
( ) Language-centered methods
( ) Learning-centered methods
Indicate the option that shows the correct matching, from top to bottom.

Bohn (2013, p. 83 and 90) argues that in Brazil teacher identity has been strongly influenced by

Judge the following items according to the text CB3A1AAA.

Software construction professionals must be acquainted with concurrency quickly.

Text 8A5AAA shows that cryptography has

It can be said from text 8A5AAA that cryptography and technology have

© Aprova Concursos - Al. Dr. Carlos de Carvalho, 1482 - Curitiba, PR - 0800 727 6282