Judge the following item according to the ideas of the previous text and its linguistic aspects.
The fragment “prevent them from using" (R. 4 and 5) can be correctly replaced with prevent them to use.
Concerning the previous text and its linguistic aspects, judge the following item.
The ideia contained in the fragment “since it provides for high levels of interconnectedness" (R.2) can also be correctly expressed as because it makes profound interconnectedness possible.
Judge the following item according to the ideas of the previous text and its linguistic aspects.
The deletion of “do" in “Different theoretical interpretations do, however, shed light" (R. 22 and 23) would not change the meaning of the fragment.
Concerning the previous text and its linguistic aspects, judge the following item.
In the fragment “rather than a practical necessity or reality for many people"(R. 11 and 12), “rather than" means instead of.
In text IV, without altering the general meaning of the sentence, "pinpoint" (l.10) could be replaced by (mark right — C — or wrong — E)
compare.
On the ideas of the text and the vocabulary used in it, judge the next items.
Considering the grammatical and semantic aspects of text I, decide whether the following items are right (C) or wrong (E).
The words “clad" (l. 18) and “quaffing" (l.19) could be correctly replaced by dressed and sipping without this altering the meaning of the sentence, although this substitution would make the text less humorous.
Considering the grammatical and semantic aspects of text IV, decide whether the following items are right (C) or wrong (E).
The expression “a bunch of" (l.45) could be replaced by a cluster of without altering the meaning of the passage.
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
In the context, the word “Yet" (l.5) conveys the same idea as the expression up until now.
Concerning the previous text and its linguistic aspects, judge the following item.
There are two modal verbs in the last sentence of the text.
